Showing posts with label fantasy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fantasy. Show all posts

Monday, December 26, 2011

The Seventh Seal [1957]

And as usual, my ability to update this blog with any consistency shows that I am made of fail. In all honestly, I had been trying to avoid movies made before 1965 as a way of keeping myself from feeling guilty about not updating. The fact is, I need a better format so I can more easily update without having to spend forever taking screen shots so that I will update more often. That experiment starts here.



So, what can I say about The Seventh Seal? It's one of the most famous Swedish films ever made by the most famous Swedish director ever. If you ask anyone on the street to name a Swedish director they will either stare at you blankly or say, "Ingmar Bergman" (or they might say "Ingrid Bergman" but she was a Swedish actress whose name is unfortunately similar). Bergman is Sweden's Kurosawa, Kubrick, Fellini and feel free to argue that I just overstated any of those directors' significances. I never claimed to be a film scholar.

Also, while I'm claiming ignorance I would like to point out that my knowledge of Swedish film is minimal, especially when compared to my knowledge of well, pretty much every other notable-film-producing country. My exposure to Swedish film boils down to these three things:

1.) Let The Right One In was a great movie.
2.) I've seen all the Millennium Trilogy movies. The first was the best.
3.) Ingmar Bergman is the most famous Swedish director and he has made quite a lot of films including Persona, Through a Glass Darkly, and The Seventh Seal.

One thing I recently heard about Bergman's films might be at least partially an explanation for his international fame: he makes movies that aren't about Sweden but are about people. This quality of universality seems to be prevalent in internationally known directors. Even if you look at how Kurosawa made a lot of movies involving samurai, a traditionally Japanese thing, a lot of his samurai films were remade into Westerns in the Western world with otherwise very little about them changed.

The Seventh Seal
's universal theme is the idea of facing your mortality and as a result, doubt in one's religious faith. When the film was made in the 50s this was likely a very relevant idea as it has been for hundreds of years. However, when you look at the film through the eyes of today, I find that I don't see it as topical anymore. Perhaps it is just my limited scope of the world but in the past it seemed that a good amount of the population was very religiously devoted almost out of obligation which is why so many people would suffer a crisis of faith like the main character, Antonius, does in this film. You were pulled into religion by your family or your society without ever giving you a real chance to question and explore whether or not the ideas seemed real to you. It was accepted as truth without much further thought for most or all of your life.

Nowadays it seems like people are starkly divided between those who have unwavering faith and those who have no faith. This does not mean there is not some in between area such as people who have no faith but want there to be an afterlife and people who have faith but may question or fear the exact structure of the afterlife they will enter. However, a crisis of faith in the modern world is rare. If you believe, you always believe. If you don't, you won't be convinced otherwise.

For Bergman, this movie seems very personal. His father was a Luthern priest who raised him on his beliefs and while Bergman says he stopped having faith at age eight, it took many years for him to cope with this idea. This movie shows that struggle very clearly in the behaviors of his characters, especially Antonius.

While I do question the relevance of the religious themes to a modern audience, the film is a great example of what those ideas were like in a time when religious devotion was so strong that some had to question it, the Black Plague, while still having been significant to an audience of the 50s. Also, the related themes of mortality and fear of death will always be important no matter what year you watch this movie. That, Bergman's superb direction, and all the iconic scenes that have been parodied one hundred times over will always make this film one that will always be a great work of art.

So by now it should be clear that this is a pretty serious movie but it is actually not without its comedy moments either. In the interest of simplicity, I will break down the plot quickly for those who have already seen it or who like to be spoiled beforehand. Expect silliness as I also can only be serious for so long. So here's "The Seventh Seal" a.k.a. "Road Trips, Chess Games, and Uninvited Dinner Guests."

The film starts with our protagonist, Antonius Block (that's not him), lying by the water side with his squire, Jons, and a chessboard after just coming home from the Crusades to hear that Sweden has been ravaged with the Plague. If you happen to be well versed in medieval times you might already be seeing the ingredients in the anachronism soup. There was a gap of time between the Crusades and the Black Plague in Sweden but Bergman seemed to forsake the particulars of history in favor of combining many comparative ideas that apply to the theme: a war based on religious holy lands and a disease that the religious populous thought to be divine punishment.


During their time lying in the sand, Antonius looks up to see a creepy dude with no eyebrows and a black monk-like robe standing before him. He identifies himself to be Death and says that he has been at his side for a long time. Antonius claims to be unafraid but before Death can claim him, he challenges him to a chess match, the terms being that as long as the game is going on he can live but that if he is defeated, Death can claim him. By totally random happenstance, Death is the black pieces.


The scene then cuts to Antonius and Jons, his squire, riding into town. Jons is the bitterly realistic comic relief sidekick as shown by his tendency to sing songs he made up about banging sluts and how Satan is with us. He asks a dead body for direction and is surprisingly chill by the man's lack of eyes. The man is a little too dead to answer but Jons says that he was very informative. Hint: plague.


They end up going past a caravan full of a performance troupe and the focus switches to them: the horny leader, Skat, and a happily married average guy, hot girl couple of Jof and Mia with their son Mikeal. Jof has visions of the Christ child. Mia thinks he's delightfully quirky.


On their first stop in town Jons encounters a painter painting a mural of the danse macabre and hears about how the Plague has brought on a bunch of people who whip themselves to try to show God that they are punishing themselves enough to have the plague removed. He talks bitterly but almost amused about how the Crusades are a useless endeavor. Antonius goes to confession about his religious doubts and fear of death, confessing to the priest that he is battling Death and reveals his strategy. Surprise! Death was in the confessional. Sneaky bastard.

On their way out they see a woman who will be burned to death for hanging with Satan*. More anachronism soup. Antonius asks the woman to arrange a meeting between him and the devil but she's too wonked out to give details.

Jons goes into a barn and sees a thief stealing jewels from a dead body. A woman comes inside and he threatens her so Jons jumps out and saves the day. He threatens to slice up the thief if he sees him again and tells the mute woman to be grateful for him valiantly not raping her and instead asks her to come along as his housekeeper. Their first road trip companion is on board!

During one of the stage troupe's performances, Skat runs off into the woods with some wench because his desire for nookie is stronger than his desire for money apparently. Then the show is interrupted by a procession of flagellants and monks pleading forgiveness. Buzzkill.
It looks kind of like crucified Jesus is holding back Jof and Mia from the priest giving the doom and gloom sermon. Weird foreshadowing?


After complaining that the procession was deary, Captain Obvious a.k.a. Jons gets asked by a smith named Plog if he has seen his wife who ran off with an actor. Inside the tavern he ends up asking Jof the same thing which leads to a showdown between the two of them and the thief from earlier who got himself involves for no reason. Jons comes in to break up the ruckus and cuts up the thief's face like he promised.

Antonius finds Mia and chats about her performance before Jof comes in and she treats his wounds. Jons and mute girl show up looking for Antonius and they all have a picnic and decide to be BFFs and road trip together.
Plog, having nothing better to do, decides to come along and they let him because they really need a fat, stupid guy to help round out their quirky cast.

Not long after they've left they see Skat and his hoe walking through the woods. Plog chases after him and Skat tries to defend the honor of Kunigunda, as she realistically told him her name was. Plog identifies her as "Rumpy, smutty, slutty Lisa", his wife. In spite of him calling her a tramp and a strumpet, she goes back to him and Skat hides in a tree. Death comes along and cuts down the tree while Skat asks desperately if there are exceptions for actors. This is the world before shows like "ET"; actors don't get exceptions from Death EVER, if anything they are bigger targets.


Jons is clearly unamused by Lisa's apology.

Casualties: 1 + everyone dead of plague
Road Trippers: 7

Antonius: The conflicted, kind but inactive protagonist.
Jons: The realist, bitter comic side kick.
Mute Girl: The eye candy/fetish fuel.
Jof & Mia: The jovial mismatched happy couple.
Plog: The fat, stupid one.
Lisa: The skank.

Wednesdays on Fox. 9/8 Central.

They run into the executors carrying off the witch girl from earlier and Antonius and Jons help so Antonius can ask her again if he can meet the devil and ask him about God. He quickly realizes that she is just crazy and mercifully gives her some pain killers before they burn her. They watch in morbid fascination as the fear of death finally crosses over her face and then leave to go make a campfire.


Their rendition of "Kumbaya" is interrupted by the thief from earlier showing up riddled with plague and asking for some water. Mute girl tries to give him some but Jons stops her and reminds her of the rule about not being a hero.


Death shows up to play chess with Antonius again. Jof can see Death but Mia insists that he is playing against himself. They start to sneak away and in an effort to do something significant before his inevitable death, Antonius knocks over the pieces to distract Death while they escape. And this is right after Death said nothing escapes him. While that's true in the long run, it seems that for now Jof, Mia, and Mikeal may be safe.

Death puts the pieces back in order and checkmates Antonius, saying that the next time they meet, he will take him.


The remaining trippers finally get to Antonius' castle, their final destination** and meet his rather stern wife, Karin, alone in the house since all the servants have run for it. The air around them is bleak and plaguey.

They all settle down for an awkward dinner party while Karin reads the verse from the Bible about the seventh seal that was said in the beginning of the film. Appropriate since they believe they are experiencing the Apocalypse. Then the worst thing ever happens: an uninvited guest shows up and they don't have enough meat to go around! He informs him that it's a Mr. Death here for something about the reaping*** and they all look at him in fearful awe except for mute girl who happily kneels before him. Apparently she had more backstory than we knew about.

When Jof and Mia wake up the next morning, Jof sees them with Death playing a game of crack the whip. He tells her he's seeing the dance of death of their friends and she tells him he's silly but Jof knows all great movies**** end with a dance party.


So anyway, Seventh Seal is a pretty great movie. If you are a camerawork nerd you will love Bergman's mise-en-scene, a philosophy/theology/lit nerd you'll love the theme, and just a regular person (*scoff*) you'll love the plot, characters, and bits of weird comedy.

Go rent it or else Death will come visit you and you'll have to play a game with him. I don't know if he takes requests but here's an idea.


* possibly more than hanging.
** I so clever.
*** Monty Python's Meaning of Life
**** Well, all Dreamworks movies which range from pretty good to dreadful. Although The Prisoner ended with a dance party and it was an amazing show.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

A Trip To The Moon [1902]

Ah, science fiction.

Wait, let me rephrase that: Ah, science fiction/fantasy!

It should have been clear from my introduction to this blog (and well, the header at the top of this page) that eventually I would be doing a post on this movie and being that I have been rather lazy lately and haven't updated in a little while, I thought it would be perfect to do this movie now. Because it's only about 9 minutes long. Yep.

So my pre-picture-plot-posting topic for today is about the delicate difference between science fiction and fantasy because I have an English degree which means I can be a real jerk when it comes to using terms correctly. To make things clear: there is a difference and many movies you can think of probably fall under both categories.

To preface this, I just finished watching Inception [2010] with my brother which is a really solid example of a movie that is science fiction but not fantasy. The world of the movie is exactly the same as ours with the one little exception of there being this strange piece of technology that because of its creation has spawned a multitude of jobs, interests, and problems that would otherwise not exist. Take out the dream machine and you have reality as it is now. Anything fantastic happens within the confides of a dream and therefore reality is preserved as being what it establishes itself to be: our world with a dream machine.

On the opposite end of the spectrum would be a movie like any Alice in Wonderland film. The world Alice is in is fantasy but there is nothing bound by reality's established rules of science or any kind of scientific advancement that affects a reality the view is familiar with.

As I said most movies are a combination of both but sometimes it can be hard to tell, particularly if the movie starts out seeming firmly ground in science fiction and then introduces fantasy elements. One such movie I can think of like this is Total Recall [1990]. The movie starts off with the advanced technology one would see in any other science fiction movie and then after Arnold Schwarzenegger arrives on Mars, the movie brings in other life forms.

The one general way to turn sci-fi into sci-fi/fantasy: Just add aliens.

You can even break down common elements of either into categories:

Robots: Science Fiction

Time Travel: Science Fiction

Time Travel via Time Lord: Science Fiction/Fantasy

Another World Like Ours: Fantasy

Space Travel: Science Fiction

Space Travel With Aliens: Science Fiction/Fantasy

Mind Fucking Tech: Science Fiction

Vampires/Werewolves/Mermaids/Etc.: Fantasy

Talking Animals: Fantasy

Alchemy
: About 85% Science Fiction and 15% Fantasy (if done right)

One of the only exceptions to this general outline that I can think of is any Michael Bay movie which generally hops over what should be somewhat science fiction and goes straight to fantasy. Although this is not because of any stylistic choice; he just happens to ignore all logical laws of science instantly putting himself in fantasy (stuff is loud in space!).

Anyway, Georges Méliès' A Trip To The Moon (or: Le Voyage dans la lune) was the first science fiction (science fiction/fantasy) film ever made. Supposedly it's about 14 minutes if you watch it at the speed they would have watched it back in 1902. For me it was about 10 minutes.

There are also two different background tracks that I've heard to the movie: one is the expected musical track that you hear with silent movies and the other is that of a narrator over a softer musical track explaining what is going on. At the time, narrators were used over music. Either one is fine and I didn't really find there to be much of a difference between the two but this was obviously in a time before movies that dialogue cards to move plot along so that might affect your personal preference.

Other fun facts about this movie:

* Méliès wanted to profit off the film but copies were made and distributed, leading him to become bankrupt.

* This movie seems to have a some steampunk presence to it which would put it at one of the few steampunk-inspired works that were created in the era itself. (Although 1901-1910 is the Edwardian era, not the Victorian but steampunk generally covers both up until about the 1920s when dieselpunk takes over; it's a rather thin line sometimes, particularly in the 1910s).

* Apparently the movie is supposed to end with the astronomers return to Earth and a parade in their honor but the scene was lost. Apparently, they found the complete version of the film in a BARN in 2002 and it had been entirely hand colored. Supposedly the release is out there but I have yet to actually see it.
This is not the first time I have heard of a missing film turning up many years later. Movies were also not able to be preserved in the way they are now so a lot of films had to be extensively restored. In Japan in 1923 the Great Kanto earthquake destroyed a lot of early Japanese films and people are still finding them in random places (in case you wanted to know that earthquake was a 7.9, less than the recent one at 9.0 but many, many more people died).

* The Smashing Pumpkins' music video for the song "Tonight, Tonight" is based off of this movie and the album art for their album Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness also shows strong influence from this film. Although I would not recommend watching the video until the end of my review because it's spoiler-y. Or about as spoiler-y as it can be.





*Also, you can watch this movie in it's entirety on YouTube because it is in the public domain. Considering the quality of my pictures, it would make a lot of sense to do so because you can barely see all the little details that you would see if you actually watch the film.

Anyway, now that we have all that cleared up, on with the show!

And I should warn you, these are going to be the worst looking screenshots I will ever take. It's not me man, it's the 1900s.



Here we see a meeting of wizards astronomers, discussing their upcoming trip to the moon. Now, while I love the look of the set, I cannot understand why these men of science are dressed in pointed hats, don't-lick-your-scars collars, and robes with stars on them. Is this supposed to be a criticism of their upcoming folly? It's clearly not supposed to be realistic but they really look ready to do magic, not science.


Six of the men volunteer for the mission and take off their incredibly silly hats, collars, and robes and exchange them for more reasonable coats and top hats.


Here we see the ship they intend to use. Remember, the moon landing happened in 1969 a whole 67 years after this movie was made. In that time, the logic behind the shape of the ship is rather similar. It looks like a bullet. Good for shooting through the air. Makes sense.


Remember when I said steampunk? This is what I was thinking of in particular.

I wish I knew more about how the actual sets were colored because there is a lot of detail in there to really play up the fact that is going to be in black and white (which makes me really wonder what the colored version looks like). Look in particular at the man's telescope. That has to be painted to have such a shape contrast. But what is it really?


On launch day the ship is put on top of . . . rooftops? Also, the ground crew is made up of women in revealing sailor suits. That's how you know the director was a straight man.

Here one of the astronomers seems to be attempting to serenade all of the crew on the ledge. Ambitious.


The ship's crew climbs into the bullet ship.


The bullet is then loaded into the launching mechanism. Is it too earlier in the history of film to look for phallic imagery? I mean, skanky salior suits. It's not too big a stretch. That's what she said.


Thanks for illustrating my point further, girls.


The bullet comparison continues as the ship is literally SHOT into space. That operator must have impeccable aim. The French army could use him. Or they could just fight with the sailor suit army and there would be a faster win for the Allies in WWI.


The man in the moon. Literally.

There's a dance scene in Moulin Rouge [2001] that references this film as much as the Smashing Pumpkins video above and this shot reminded me of it.


This is the most famous scene from the movie. All I could think was, "Damn, that ship must be HUGE."

Also, doesn't it look like a large soda can? It's a many decades too early reference to humans leaving their junk all over the moon. *gasp* Méliès was psychic!



Somehow being able to sustain life, the astronomers leave the ship and take an excited look around.


At night (I guess?), they roll out their sleeping bags and curl up under the sky and see a shooting star.


Stars with people's faces in them? Am I the only one who finds this really grotesque?


Apparently from the moon, constellations actually look like the figures they represent.


Moon dust storm?


They travel into an Alice in Wonderland cave and look around. Hopefully they avoid the mushrooms. Those things will probably either kill you instantly or make you trip balls forever.


A moon monster appears!


But apparently the moon monsters are made of nitrogen triiodide or something because a little touch with an umbrella makes them explode.


A slew of moon monsters come after them for killing their friends, tie them up, and bring them to the moon king and his court which looks vaguely Aztec.


Of course, having learned that these things are made of the most unstable compounds ever, they easily kill the king and make an escape with many moon monsters still hot on their heels.


In order to escape, they all crowd into the ship and push it over a ledge.


Somehow the ship lands in the ocean. This part truly doesn't make sense to me. Did they fall back to Earth or are there oceans on the moon?


But apparently that's the end. Of course, we know from the complete version that they make it back and have a parade in their honor but I'm still not sure what to think of this ocean confusion.

Anyway, it's a really interesting film and truly amazing considering it was made in 1902 before any film conventions had been established and before cameras were really being used to tell fictional stories.

Go check it out. If you don't like it, you only lost 10 minutes of your time that you probably would have wasted doing nothing anyway.